issue 12

CURTIS MALLET EXCELS  BY ASSISTING KAZAKHSTAN IN $1 BILLION DEAL

American Law Daily reports:  “Seeking to gain a stake in the country’s second-largest oil field, the Republic of Kazakhstan has turned to its longtime outside counsel at Curtis, Mallet-Prevost, Colt & Mosle for advice amid a two-year dispute with an international consortium of energy giants over what is known as the Karachaganak Petroleum Operating project.” D31  Curtis Mallet has some highly capable attorneys that need not have another dragging their reputations and other things down.   Kazakhstan is run by President Nursultan Nazarbayev.  He is known as a strongman, dictator, autocrat, oligarch depending who you ask. It is not easy being a strong man oligarch in a tough neighborhood.  He has developed a highly advanced society that is the envy of other nation  states.   Kazakhstan oil and the President’s use of it to benefit society has attracted opportunists from across the globe.  Some come as a panderer  like  USA President Slick Willie  Clinton looking for a hefty Clinton Foundation donation while others want to make commercial agreements, especially regarding oil.  This is where Curtis Mallet partner adeptly fits into the scheme of things.   Perhaps someone at Curtis Mallet had the long ago far sight to hang around with the right UN Counselor officials.  Whatever the attorney has done,  it has been a lasting business friendship.  This is the type of law partner cherished, not one who is in apparent drag upon the others.

_____________________________________-

MORMON’S DEBATE HARDSHIPS OF WOMEN MARRIED TO  GAY MEN

DailyBeast.com reports: “Understanding and Helping Those Who Have Homosexual Problems instructed Mormon leaders that ‘marriage should not be viewed as a way to resolve homosexual problems.’ The handbook cited the deleterious effects of this policy on both gay men and ‘the lives of others,’ referring, of course, to the women who spent years locked in marriages with them. … ‘in the past, Mormon women married to gay Mormon men experienced “a consistent pattern of despair and self-loathing at their inability to achieve reciprocal intimacy.’ ‘I get a little defensive when somebody calls my husband gay,’ says one woman … with a defiance that seems to barely paper over a deeper sadness. But the fact that the men of My Husband’s Not Gay refuse to label themselves as ‘gay’ is just as worrying.” D32  Hypocrisy prevails within conservative religious groups.  When the heterosexual community attempts to contort Mother Nature,  there is always conflict and anguish.  You cannot put a square peg in a round hole, sort of speak.

 

GAY PEOPLE SHOULD NOT HAVE TO HIDE BEHIND THE MARRIAGE/CHILDREN FACADE ANYMORE

Huffington Post reports: “Slated to air on TLC … ‘My Husband’s Not Gay’ promotes ‘the false and dangerous idea that gay people can and should choose to be straight in order to be part of their faith communities,’ according to the Change.org … GLAAD President and CEO Sarah Kate Ellis … ‘No one can change who they love, and, more importantly, no one should have to,’ “ D33  From information and belief, gay men living the facade of  heterosexual  hypocrisy within a family context are prone to devious behavioral business practices.  This may be a main factor in the lack of legal and other business ethics of these persons.  They seem to get  satisfaction out of cheating the system, especially in a heterosexual setting.  They have been living a community imposed lie all of their cognizant life.  Many senior lawyers have seen this change in lawyering where this behavior has created a ‘every lawyer for themselves’ conviction.  Law firms have suffered and are now in constant vigilance for the tell tale behavior.  The difficulty is when these persons are Pavlovian rewarded for  unethical if not criminal behavior.

_____________________________________

BRADLEY/CHELSEA MANNING FINALLY AT ONE WITH HERSELF

Wikipedia reports: “Chelsea Elizabeth Manning  (born Bradley Edward Manning, December 17, 1987) is a United States Army soldier who was convicted in July 2013 of violations of the Espionage Act and other offenses, after releasing the largest set of classified documents ever leaked to the public. Manning is a trans woman who, in a statement the day after sentencing, said she had felt female since childhood, wanted to be known as Chelsea, and desired to begin hormone replacement therapy. From early life and through much of her Army life, Manning was known as Bradley; she was diagnosed with gender identity disorder while in the Army. C34  Bradley Edward Manning was  brilliant enough to be accepted at MIT.  If he had not had to live a gender lie he would not have been hired by USA Defense Department at such a pivotal role.  Chelsea may have been a Silicon Valley start-up whiz, where everybody is allowed to be comfortable within their own skin.  How many of these profiles have destroyed law firms and businesses because of pent-up  frustration?   It is the need to hide because of taboos that is the societal dysfunction.   Being opaque  is no longer acceptable societal behavior.

________________________________________

NEW YORK STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL INVESTIGATES KEVIN J COLLINS CHARITABLE TRUST CONTROLLED BY CURTIS MALLET

New York County Surrogate Court File number 2014-4249 says: “Accounting by Robert W Sheehan as Partner representing Curtis Mallet in a trust created by him December 12, 2002 and amended thereafter.” C35  Kevin J Collins was grantor and Curtis Mallet partner representative Robert W Sheehan was made trustee.

____________________________________________________________

Letters to Director:

Dear Director: There seem to be a lot of use of the word partner. You have a CM partner, a CM partner’s partner, CM partners and so forth. What does this signify in simple terms? Are these guys gay and hate straight clients? Are some gay and you are using the new flavor of the day to explain them? We didn’t see CM partners partner thank god because we would be really confused. When do these CM partners have any time to represent clients?  Confused Barrister

Director: Are these what Arnold Schwarzenegger called girlyboys? Is there any law that would require these humans to tell women their proclivities before the women enters into a civil marriage contract with them before committing to a family. This should be a criminal violation if proven by the women at a later date. These self proclaimed girlymen can be a very strong part of the community if they come out of hiding behind false marriages and families. They can have surrogate children with their partners. There are law firms that have forthright girlymen as partners. I found your Curtis Mallet newsletter citations while researching  this subject.  Arnold has a nearby office.  Venice Beach Gal

Dear Director: It must be very hard on wives and children to live within a fraudulent family. We have talked about this in our synagogue and found it not a liberal or conservative issue. We see these men in need of the true relationships with a male partner. We are joyous these men are starting to live like they wish rather than cause harm raising a family under the shadow of fraud. We believe these men are inclined to continue their fraudulent behavior into their careers. They are more inclined to defraud clients and commit criminal violations.  Brooklyn Mom

Gentlermen: It’s not just a matter of whether or not you should have high grades to get an interview at a particular firm, it’s a matter of integrity.  We work in a profession where ethics and integrity are extremely important. Whatever happened to valuing the fundamentals upon which our legal system is based? Does the New York Bar want an “Officer of the Court” to be lacking an ability to tell the difference between right and wrong? Isn’t that the definition of insanity. Denver Judge

Gentlemen: Why is it that corruption begins and ends in New York and Washington? The lawyers from both cities are reprehensible to the eye and ear. How many times do we have to read tabloids to see mugs of these disgusting creatures. New Jersey attorney

__________________________________________

 Dear Readership:

Curtis Mallet has an enviable growing international list of desired clients.  Usually law firms such as Curtis Mallet shed those who cannot keep up to the drift of the law firm.  Curtis Mallet is increasingly concentrated international law firm.  It should not be interested in a Skype international wills/trust department.  It cannot be implemented, hence the recent laughing at the Curtis Mallet partner saying they practiced this fictional law.  There is a desire of many foreigners to obtain ports of refuge, safe havens or other similar terms.  This usually means tax avoidance.  Like what a Curtis Mallet partner allegedly tried in Florida.  He got away with this behavior for a few years until we exposed him.

info@internalrevenue.org

Comments are closed.