issue 10

 

_____________________________________________

Joseph Pizzuro Curtis Mallet Managing Partner

__________________________________________________

CURTIS MALLET  BAR SUSPENDED ATTORNEY LOREN FRIEDMAN BACK IN NEWS

Abovethelaw.com reports: “Loren Friedman [see issue 1] earned Lawyer of the Day honors … when the then-Curtis Mallet associate was busted for doctoring his law school grades from the University of Chicago, by changing Cs into Bs and As. Almost two years after the ethics complaint against Friedman was filed, the Illinois Review Board has rendered its verdict. … Good news for the unethical. … Board proposed an 18-month suspension, reduced from the three year sentence previously recommended. … he will have to “satisfy his obligation of establishing his character and fitness before resuming practice.” B27  It is a disgrace that these lawyers are allowed to continue with their licenses to practice law after such breaches of ethics.  Is it any wonder why at least one Curtis Mallet continues practicing law in New York state after  alleged continuing criminal violations of USA Federal and state law.

 

CURTIS MALLET HYGIENE DECEPTION, AGAIN!

Abovethelaw reports: “Curtis, Mallet-Prevost, Colt & Mosle … In its e-mail making the case for “business casual,” the firm reminded associates that pecs [pectoral muscles] are not to be admitted into evidence: By all means resist the urge to acquaint us with your chest hair. If you think it necessary to impress the ladies with your efforts at the gym over the winter, think again – we are not a particularly good demographic for that. After that, the memo’s author reminds the gents that loose-fitting suits can help hide pounds. We’re not sure what that has to do with business casual exactly, and suspect the firm just wanted to try to give equal attention to men and women so as not to appear to be solely lecturing females guilty of summer-slutty fashion sense. (As the Seventh Circuit did last month.) After the jump, we bring you the full memo, which advises the ladies to “save it for the clubs or the beach.” According to the tipster who sent this along, the advice “wasn’t well received.” B28 If these Curtis Mallet lawyers cannot finesse a hygiene memo, how can they represent international clients?

 

CURTIS MALLET ATTEMPTS TO CONVERT ANOTHER CLIENT PROPERTY

De Guigne Family v. Curtis, Mallet-Prevost says: “The defendant (Curtis Mallet) law firm was lawfully in possession of the files relating to its clients as custodian for the benefit of the clients and their estates … no wrong had been committed by the defendant until plaintiff demanded the files … When the defendant refused to comply with the demand, a cause of action for either conversion or replevin accrued. …. Obviously here the cause of action accrued after the deaths of both testators and therefore the plaintiff is within his rights to carry on the instant suit. … Accordingly, the motions of the defendant (Curtis Mallet) to dismiss the complaints are denied, and the cross motion of the plaintiff for the relief demanded in the complaint is granted, limited, however, to those files which decedents themselves could have demanded.” B29   Louise Collins had a De Guigne family boyfriend at one time.  Louise was disheartened when she heard Curtis Mallet refused to give implicating documents back to the De Guigne family, until forced by the court.  We see Curtis Mallet has followed their pattern with Kevin J Collins and his estate account, but  with criminal violations.   We have seen outright Curtis Mallet theft of jewelry, a car, unknown account assets forcibly gained through deceptive investment practices,  conflict of interest in appointing family members as trustees , advising a client to commit wiretapping crimes,  ad nausea.

_________________________________________________________

Turner Smith Curtis Mallet Partner

___________________________________________________________

HUSBAND CONTINUES TO INTERVIEW NEW YORK > USA > INTERNATIONAL LAWYERS FOR REPRESENTATION

As mentioned in Issue 6, Louise Collin’s present husband of four years has been collaborating with  New York lawyers regarding  Curtis Mallet violations in New York State.   Our readership letters show a definite interest by many law firms for representation.    We do know those lawyers already interviewed  have written to us with further interesting enlightenments.  At very least, our newsletter seems to be on the “must read”  list.    Curtis Mallet has worldwide legal offices.  This allegedly has allowed Husband Herb to use many of his international law contacts from Mexico to India in obtaining the most favorable venues.

 

11-23-90 kjc<

 

Above is the earliest divorce document on record of Kevin J Collins at the alleged  initiative of Curtis Mallet partner Robert W Sheehan.  Please note how ethically careful Attorney Dixon is regarding proposed client Kevin J Collins residency within Florida for his client representation.  Whereas, Robert W Sheehan deliberately violates both Federal and state laws by initiating various schemes from the questionable New York City Curtis Mallet office generated wills/trusts targeting a Florida resident.    From his New York City office Sheehan urged Kevin J Collins in Fisher Island, Florida allegedly to criminally violate Florida wiretap laws.   Each interstate taping compounded the  USA Federal and Florida state criminal violations.

 

CURTIS MALLET PARTNERS DISREGARD FOR USA FEDERAL AND FLORIDA STATE LAWS

Curtis Mallet partner has been stalking and diminishing the wife of Kevin J Collins for more than 25 years with divorce lawyers (issue 2). The Curtis Mallet partner has allegedly fantasized for decades over converting the Kevin J Collins accounts to his own family possession and control by inserting his two sons at every portal (issue 3). We have documented unauthorized wrenching of Kevin J Collins account assets from honorable and respected Inverness Counsel (issue 3) to a hastily fabricated Thomas V Sheehan 1 person Round Oak Capital boutique without the mandatory signature of Trustee Louise Collins (issue 3). We have documented how Kevin J Collins assets have allegedly been unaccounted in the Sheehan generated Round Oak Capital boutique. We have documented Curtis Mallet partner transferring of the questionable Kevin J Collins trusteeships to sons Thomas V Sheehan and William B Sheehan (issue 3).

_________________________________________________________

J Adams Curtis Mallet Partner

__________________________________________________________

A REVEALING QUESTION ABOUT MR ROGERS AND HIS CHILDREN’S SHOW

Huffington Post reports: “The nagging question is also understandable if we acknowledge that gay men of Rogers’ generation (and discretion) often hid their gay sexuality by marrying women and having children, all the while engaging in gay sex on the sly. Rogers was married to one woman, Joanne, for almost all his adult life, and their relationship, by all accounts a loving and devoted one, resulted in the birth of two sons. B30 We advocate transparency by all partners in a marriage, be they hetero or homo sexual. We urge partners to tell their truthful inclinations so others will not be victimized at home or business. Why should there be a need for “gay sex on the sly” harming the duped innocent in a sham marriage?  We admire those who “came out” during the Stonewall uprising.  We wish all humans should be so forthright.   Transparency should supersede opaqueness, slyness or shadows.

_____________________________________________

Letters to Director:

Dear Director: This stuff should be sent to the DailyMail, New York Post or National Enquirer.  What are you waiting for, just do it.  The people deserve to know this stuff goes on. –  Reader

Director:  This Sheehan person you mention is not well liked either in the legal profession or socially. It’s alarming that Curtis Mallet has defended his antics for so long since none of the other firms did. We have strong reason to believe this Kevin J Collins account he acquired in a unscroupulous manner is his only sizable account, ever. He has touted it like a banner for years. Your newsletter questions his very authority over this account. Sheehan clings to the Vietor name socially, much to the embarrassment of his well respected in-laws. Sheehan is a disgrace in every way to the New York legal profession. We cheer you on as we pass the word.  –  The New York legal beagles

Director:  An attorney should always be mindful at what they instruct their client to do. There are cases I will give you where there have been criminal charges brought against the attorney when the Client gets addicted to repeatedly committing the criminal acts instructed by the attorney. This seems the case here where the Client started wiretaping even the attorney conversations. – Litigator

Director:  Who gets to see the tapes? The Florida taping may be problematic in that it was instructed, or advised, or ordered by Curtis partner, to which his Client implemented the crime against those recorded. On the other hand, the New York to New York tapes can be admissible as evidence if the criminal acts are discussed regarding the Florida wiretaps or other events. – Malpractice lawyer

Dear Director:  A certain Curtis Law Firm matter has been brought to my attention.  You’ve  shown a proper sensitivity to this Curtis lawyer using a black man as a tool  to denigrate Louise Collins and advance Curtis Law Firm standing with the supposed Curtis Client Kevin J Collins.  I wish I could say the same about the crude deceitful actions of the Curtis lawyer.  We must put this in the perspective of two decades or more ago when a relationship between a black man and  a white woman was considered taboo.   It was not like now where we see many white woman in the entertainment field marrying black men.   To think this lawyer is still working at Curtis is problematic.  I’m bringing the matter to the attention of my Board and recommend action be taken against Curtis. –  New York Civil Rights attorney

_____________________________________________

Dear Readership:

A personal representative can only be appointed by qualifying under Florida Statutes Section 733.304. “A person who is not domiciled in the state cannot qualify as personal representative unless the person is … A spouse or a brother, sister, uncle, aunt, nephew or niece or the decedent, or someone related by lineal consanguinity to any such person.”

We have seen outright Curtis Mallet witnessed theft of jewelry, a dubious car conversion  as well as estate assets forcibly gained thought deceptive investment practices  against a victimized  Kevin and Louise Collins.  To cover their crimes Curtis Mallet fired Kevin J Collins long time  ethical accountants and investment firms seeking opaqueness.  We then saw Curtis Mallet  implement conflict of interest by appointing Curtis Mallet partner family members as trustees and  advising a client to commit wiretapping crimes.  Some of the violations mentioned in confidence by reliable sources have yet to be divulged to our newsletter or  other media.  This is necessary so Curtis Mallet partner’s behavior can be outed to the court of public opinion.

info@internalrevenue.org

 

 

Comments are closed.